Monday, 30 March 2009

En la ciudad de Sylvia (2009)



Spanish director José Luis Geurin inflicts his audience with this laboured, tedious and pretentious exploration of voyeurism and the allure of images - both cinematic and actual. The heavily deconstructed narrative follows an arrestingly angular young man as he attempts to track down a former lover on the streets of Strasbourg. Despite the chiseled features and eurotrash pose, both the searcher and the film prove surprisingly irritating considering their brief screen time - an excruciating 84 minutes. The approving reviews from the artier side of the popular press are mystifying.

Antonioni does this so so so much better.

Sunday, 22 March 2009

Vineland (1990) - Thomas Pynchon



I love this book. I'm a big pynchon fan I've discovered.

UPDATE: Okay, I've finished Vineland, and I'm still a great fan, even if it isn't necessarily a great book. There are just so many wonderful moments, imaginative and hilarious turns of phrase and incredibly culturally potent conceits that I couldn't not love it.

Gore Vidal thinks Pynchon gives his characters the most awful names, but I think they're incredibly poetic in the sense that they seem to have been chosen for certain expressive or purely aural effects. Here's a rundown of some of the more interesting names and characters featured...

Zoyd Wheeler: The ostensible hero of the book
Frenesi Gates: ...
Brock Vond: ...
Prairie Wheeler: ...
Darryl Loiuse Chastain (otherwise known as DL): ...

Some interesting ideas include the Thanatoids Blah blah need to finish sometime

A few amusing images or turns of phrase (selected almost at random):
"I used to worry about you, Zoyd, but I see I can rest easy now the Vaseline of youth has been cleared from your life's lense by the mild detergent solution of time, in its passing..." Hector sat slumped in zomoskepsis, or the contemplation of his soup."

Later, describing the suerlative way DL breaks open the door of a government facility, Pynchon says something along the lines of, "she didn't Jimmy so much as James it open"

Friday, 20 March 2009

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

The Class (Entre les murs) - 2008


The Class is based on an autobiographical novel by author and former teacher François Bégaudeau, about working at a tough multi-ethnic school in the Parisian banlieux. Remarkably, Bégaudeau plays himself, or a version of himself; and he does it very well, although as Peter Bradshaw reminds us 'teaching is all about putting on a performance commanding enough to subdue the toughest audiences' so maybe that shouldn't surprise us.

The class of 14- to 15-year-old kids in the film is made up of non-professionals, and their unobtrusively superb and authentic classroom scenes have apparently been devised through improvisation.

Definitely one of the better movies I've seen this year. There are a couple of contrived, overtly didactic moments, but the rest of the movie is so enthralling (who woulda thunk a language lesson could be so exciting) that they hardly tarnish the experience.

I thought it raised lots of interesting questions about authority and the legitimacy of authority in schools (related to descriptive and prescriptive modes of language and teaching). Naice.

The Dead Girl (2006)



The Dead Girl is a quintet of stories about seemingly unrelated people whose lives converge around the murder of a young woman - not in the sense that they overlap in strange, unconvincing and implausible ways (ala Crash), but rather that the death of one girl (Brittany Murphy actually) becomes a device or, more accurately, an entry-point into the lives of 4 other women, all of whom are suffering in some tragic way. [Click on pics above for larger versions.]

The Daughter: Toni Collette plays an emotionally stunted woman terrorized by her emotionally abusive and domineering mother (who's also an invalid requiring constant attention, natch). After finding the dead girl's body, and nicking a little momento, Collette leaves her mother and embarks on an awkward love/sex-affair with serial-killer-obsessed store-clerk Giovanni Ribisi. Hilarity ensues as Collette subtly but implacably makes BDSM-related demands to be tied up and beaten etc etc - my personal fave

The Sister: Woman with missing/abducted sister mistakes body of dead girl for her sibling, coz she's also a coroner, obvs.

The Wife: Wife of man discovers man to be vicious serial killer of young girls. Decides not to turn him in.

The Mother: ha ha ha. Check out Marcia Gay Harden's costume! She's a small-town, uptight, but essentially good woman (duh! look at that collar) who discovers that her missing daughter is not only dead, but was also the dreaded hooker-lesbian-junkie combo. Marcia rescues newly-discovered grandchild from evil poor people and manages to make some sort of peace with daughter's hooker lover. Total TV movie.

The Dead Girl: Brittany Murphy ends up dead.
The Take-out: A serious, sombre and relatively bleak film which is remarkable for managing to be a film about women without becoming a 'women's film', if that makes any sense.

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Watchmen (The comic, okay) (1986-1987)







Can anything good come out of hate? Maybe. The imminent release of Watchmen the movie finally pushed me into reading Alan Moore's classic and I have to confess that my desire to hate the movie with impunity had a lot to do with me reading the graphic novel.

Only a willful contrariness (or laziness perhaps) can account for my failure to acquaint myself with Moore's tale of the superhero gone to seed*. Goodness knows it's been influential enough. Images from the comic were inescapable as I read comics in the 90s, eventually coming to be quite influential in my own daydreams featuring myself, or some other version of me, as a masked adventurer. There were in fact several owl-boys who popluated my superhero-dominated imagination.

Anyway, I've done it. I've read it. And it's good. Very. The universe Moore creates for the reader is very well realized, even without the slightly exhausting and unecessary fictional extracts and documents which end each installment. The dialogue is a bit portentious at times, and the 'mature' nature of the content is needlessly foregrounded (obsiously in an attempt to explicitly seperate Watchmen from the more pulpy adventures published by DC) - the result being that there are passages that feel a little contrived. And I tend to agree with a recent review commenting that the comic's denouement reads as slight naive and fanciful. The idea that mankind would suddenly abandon all intra-species conflic in the face of an alien invasion stratches the limits of credibility, but doesn't seem entirely out of place within the narrative to be absolutely fair.

What works:
Dr Manhattan is terrifying.
The scenes with Rorschach and the neon lighting outside the hoodlum's apartment are great.
Silk Spectre is a wonderful character. Selfish and self-absorbed in a wonderfully realistic way.

Anyway, have to dash, more coming soon...

*On this topic, it's interesting to think of The Incredibles as a sunnier version of the same story.

NEW: here are two scans from the book. One of them is interesting for its cinematic quality, the neon switching on and off in time with Rorschach's step is awkward but also ambitious. Not sure it really works. The other scan is from a bit near the end where Ozymandias sets off his alien-bomb-teleportation thingy. Through most of the book the newsagent and the kid reading the pirate comic next to the newstand have a pretty indifferent/antogonistic relationship and the way they move towards each other in the face of their imminent death is pretty poignant. The plain white panel to end the issue is also quite effective, no? Oh, wait, I already have images of those panels...oh well.

Sunday, 22 February 2009

Vampyr (1932)















Carl Dreyer's Vampyr is unquestionably an astonishing feat of film-making, due in no small part to the innovative craftsmanship which must have seemed so radicaly new in 1932. That is, admittedly, what impressed me most on my first viewing. 'What? This is 1932?...Wow'. The movement of the camera in particular seems very sophisticated, even by contemporary standards. Many of the film's effects are hokey by comparison with modern cinema, but to zoom-in on these effects strikes me as uncharitable and misguided...better to appreciate the strange and mysterious imagery of the film...

On the DVD commentary Guillermo del Toro quotes Magritte stating that the duty of the artist is to connect us with mystery. While I can't find that exact quote, I have found these others from Magritte: "Everything we see hides another thing, we always want to see what is hidden by what we see" & “My painting is visible images which conceal nothing... they evoke mystery and indeed when one sees one of my pictures, one asks oneself this simple question 'What does that mean'? It does not mean anything, because mystery means nothing either, it is unknowable.”

Want more time for reflection on this one, particularly because Guillermo del Toro's such a big fan. So, more to come...in the meantime, here are some images from the film , and some scans of the beautiful programme which was printed for the Danish release...

Climates (Iklimler) - 2006




The problem with an education is that you have to work so much harder for enjoyment. Or search harder and longer anyway. After watching L'eclisse earlier this year I can't help but think of Climates as Antonioni-lite. Virtually the same preoccupation with alienation, isolation and the impossibility of meaningful emotional connections between people (especially lovers) but without the technical skill or vision or artistry required to lift the plot from being merely anecdotal to something more profound and provocative.

I'm mystified as to why the film has been so critically acclaimed. Have any of these people even watched Antonioni? Surely, it's not a radical gesture to make a movie about relationships that isn't a RomCom? huh?

Plot outline: Ageing architecture professor and younger TV art director girlfriend split up after summer holiday. Man stumbles through halting relationships with family, colleagues and lovers before travelling to snowy, (eastern?) wastes of Turkey to win back the girl. Having successfully done so, he reverts to being an asshole eventually leaving the girl devastated and alone. Move closes with her crying in the snow.

Maybe I'm just being mean, but the knowledge that it's a Turkish film made on a no-doubt miniscule budget helps to undermine the director's artistic aspirations - of course it's a small, claustrophobic, 'domestic' drama with a tiny cast! What other kind of movie are you going to make in Turkey? A blockbuster sci-fi epic? You could of course argue that the director makes a virtue of necessity, but the film is just not that virtuous, sorry.

Watching the commentary for Vampyr, Guillermo del Toro quotes Magritte as saying that the purpose of art is to put us in touch with the mysterious. Perhaps Climates's problem is that it settles for just plain inscrutable.

Note: There is a rather dramatic, violent and uncomfortable love-scene, if one can call it that, that is very well realised. So it's a good reference for that kind of thing if you're looking for it.

Extra Note: This is my second big Turkish disappointment, the first being Orhan Pamuk's zzz-fest Snow.

Dreams from My Father


It was with a sense of duty that I picked up Obama's Dreams From My Father. One should at least attempt to acquaint oneself with the life and thoughts of the, how-many-times-can-we-hear-it, 'most powerful man on earth', shouldn't one? The sense of responsibility, of social and political obligation, quickly dissipates, however. Or at least for me it did. By the start of the second chapter all thoughts of what 'one' should or shouldn't do are pushed aside by the direct, earnest and slightly clumsy life-story that tumbles out of the book. Nothing feels certain about the narrative Obama constructs from his life so far. This uncertaintly is emphasized by the series of questions that seem to underpin the autobiography...'who am I?'...'where do I belong?'...'what should I do?'...'what are my responsibilities?' - Questions which I peronally find quite demanding and unsettling, and that's perhaps why I found the book so riveting.

It's amazing that given all the benefits of his birth into a white, middle-class, generally happy family, Obama felt so haunted by questions of identity and heritage. The extent to which this intelligent and obviuously remarkable man is tortured by these questions is eye-opening and I have a newfound appreciation of the complexities and difficulties of race relations, both in the US and elsewhere. I know this is odd, and perhaps even insulting, coming from a South African, but at home in South Africa you can sometimes buy into the idea that the rest of the world has the whole race-thing completely under control. This is why Americans attempting to reconnect with their African roots has always seemed so ludicrous to me, the gulf between a relatively wealthy African American and an 'actual' African seeming ridiculously wide. I have a new sympathy for these attempts after reading Obama's book, a new understanding of what the idea of Africa might stand for, what function it might serve in the political and cultural imagination of black people the world over. Despite these realizations, or because of them, I find myself skeptical of the ease with which Obama integrates himself into his African family, but perhaps I am simply jealous of the fact that I have no corresponding community to which I feel I am a part.

Personal reflections aside, I am rooting for Obama from now on, joining the ranks of his cheerleaders, and I'm vaguely embarrassed I ever supported Hillary over him. Mea culpa, mea culpa...

I picked up Dreams from My Father hoping for some sort of programmitic or didactc introduction to the policies and moral philosophy of the president of the United States of America and ended up putting down a highly personal attempt to explain a life in progress, a life that asks demanding questions of my own. As such, the book is inspiring and profoundly unsettling.

Extra Note: On purely literary terms the writing is a little hokey. The endings of many of the chapters feel slightly contrived. Over-dramatized in an attempt, perhaps, to justify the events described, to try and extract some meaning from them. There are few original images or turns of phrase. Fortunately these technical faults do little to dampen the emotional power of the book.

Sunday, 15 February 2009

Waiting for the Barbarians


It's difficult to know what Coetzee thinks of his narrators. I find them all so terribly sympathetic that it's difficult to know how one should judge their characters and actions. Waiting for the Barbarians was my introduction to yet another ageing male protagonist whose relationships with women are decidedly problematic and certainly abusive under modern codes of behaviour.

The nameless magistrate whose tale unfolds through the course of the novel is stationed on the outskirts of the Empire. Comfortable marooned on the periphery of civilization, the magistrate spends him time collecting buried artifacts from long-forgotten peoples which are scattered through the desert sands which surround the outpose and occasionally and indiscretely taking advantage of the young maids who are under his command. The arrival of the sinister Colonel Joll - a respresentative of the Empires secret police, the deliciously-named "Third Bureau" - with his queer manners and affectations (see the sunglasses excerpt I have included below) destroys the little idyll the magistrate has established. Rumours are growing that the Barbarians that surround the Empire are banding together, conspiring to attack the Empire. Oblivious to the social and cultural particulars of the peoples who surround the outpost Joll captures and tortures a boy and his father (who are quite obviously innocent) and forces the boy to lead them into the desert to reveal the hiding places of his 'co-conspirators'. Joll leads a party of men out into the desert and returns with a string of bound barbarians who who viciously and cruelly restrained by thin wires which have been woven through their hands and cheeks. Joll proceeds to torture the barbarians while the magistrate seeks to distance himself as much as possible from the abuses which take place. Having extracted the information he desires, despite its highly questionable veracity, the Colonel returns to the capital to make his report. Horrified by the torture, by the blind and needless pain inflicted on Joll's victims, the magistrate releases the Barbarians who return to the desert. Only later does the magistrate discover that they have left on of their own behind - an impassive barbarian girl who has been partially crippled and blinded, forced to beg and prostitute herself to survive. The magistrate is moved by vague and yet powerful desires, taking in the girl and subjecting(?) her to ritualistic washings of her broken body. Confused by his own motives, and potentially seeking to atone for his complicity in the torture, the magistrate decides to return the girl to her people. The gruelling journey through icy wastes which follows nearly kills the magistrate and the men who have escourted them, and is the novels most sustained piece of brilliant writing. Releasing the girl to her people and surviving the return journey, the magistrate is soon subjected to much much worse than the pain and anguish of ice, wind, snow and hunger.

Arriving back at the outpost the magistrate discovers the Empire have send troops to deal with the impending Barbarian invasion. Under suspicion of colluding with the Barbarians, and accused of various failings and abuses of power, the magistrate is jailed and tortured, subjected to countless humiliations, "I wondered how much pain a plump comfortable old man would be able to endure in the name of his eccentric notions of how the Empire should conduct itself. But my torturers were not interested in degrees of pain. They were interested only in demonstrating to me what it meant to live in a body, as a body, a body which can entertain notions of justice only as long as it is whole and well, which very soon forgets them when its head is gripped and a pipe is pushed down its gullet and pints of salt water are poured into it. ... They came to my cell to show me the meaning of humanity, and in the space of an hour they showed me a great deal.'' . Finally, the Empire's forces are expended, defeated by the unforgiving wastes which surround the outpost and the magistrate finds himself free once more, virtually taking up the position of magistrate as the Empire abandons the outpost to the wilderness and the barbarians. The End.

Here's a helpful excerpts from the New York Times review of the book: "And at the outset we also realize that this is to be a novel not about nuances of character but about a clash of moral styles, a drama of representative ways of governing." There are many instances in which the novel sketches out the dangers of a centralized and isolated government: the way people can be brutalised and abused, the way the peripheries in particular are vulnerable to exploitation and violence, the way a lack of local knowledge and sympathy leads to cruelty and, ultimately, defeat. It's a political parable, but also a story about desire really. What it's trying to say about desire, however, is much more difficult to decipher than the obvious politcal insights into certain modes of government. Also, I'm not sure I agree with the quote associated with the book that describes it as "an analogue of all men living in complicity with regimes that ignore justice and decency" mmmm. Finally, here's the bit about sunglasses that I like, it's actually the opening of the novel and very effective one at that, "I have not seen anythign like it: two little discs of glass suspended in front of his eyes in loops of wire. Is he blind?...The discs are dark, they look opaque from the outside, but he can see through them. He tells me they are a new invention..." Hmm, it isn't as impressive on a second reading, but the way the sunglasses are described in later passages, the way they figure in the narrative as the "affectation" spreads, is very well done, even if sunglasses = bad guy, is a bit of cliché.